<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel><title>Darren Duke Blog Zone | Comments</title><description>Random rambling about technology, BlackBerry, Lotus Domino, accents and the pursuit of happiness.</description><link>http://blog.darrenduke.net/Darren/DDBZ.nsf/</link><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 02:25:05 PM -0400</lastBuildDate>
<item>
<title>Not ideal</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 02:25:05 PM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Peter Smith</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>The most useful feature of Lotus Notes that most users can&#8217;t use - Full Text Indexing</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[This method is not reliable enough to be used, sometimes it works fine, but at other times you get a 'index is in use' type error, so it's not worth pursuing.<br /><br />I wonder if there is an OS way to do the same thing?]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This method is not reliable enough to be used, sometimes it works fine, but at other times you get a 'index is in use' type error, so it's not worth pursuing.<br /><br />I wonder if there is an OS way to do the same thing?]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://blog.darrenduke.net/Darren/DDBZ.nsf/dx/the-most-useful-feature-of-lotus-notes-that-most-users-cant-use-full-text-indexing.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#22072010022505p.m.WEBPLQ.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Yes that&#8217;s true....</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 07:37:25 PM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Peter Smith</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>The most useful feature of Lotus Notes that most users can&#8217;t use - Full Text Indexing</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[That's true, so maybe not great for the standard user, but a very nice option for our product - & thanks for the pointer.<br /><br />I guess what might be possible is providing a server-based agent 'run on behalf of' for immediate manual FTI moving, or a server based agent for scheduled FTI moving, such that a script agent could delete the db index, add a dir link file to act as the stub, then rebuild the index.<br /><br />If this works, we'll make a utility available for people to use as well.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[That's true, so maybe not great for the standard user, but a very nice option for our product - & thanks for the pointer.<br /><br />I guess what might be possible is providing a server-based agent 'run on behalf of' for immediate manual FTI moving, or a server based agent for scheduled FTI moving, such that a script agent could delete the db index, add a dir link file to act as the stub, then rebuild the index.<br /><br />If this works, we'll make a utility available for people to use as well.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://blog.darrenduke.net/Darren/DDBZ.nsf/dx/the-most-useful-feature-of-lotus-notes-that-most-users-cant-use-full-text-indexing.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#19072010073725p.m.WEBVPX.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>I think this is possible?</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 07:00:39 PM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Darren Duke</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>The most useful feature of Lotus Notes that most users can&#8217;t use - Full Text Indexing</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[I had actually tried this too, and it works just like the old stub file hack to move a DB out of the data folder. The problem with this approach is that you need access to the file system. As I see it, the customers who have FTI "disabled" are the larger ones (1,000's or 10,000's of users). They will never give you file system access and they should not have to. <br /><br />Why must my life be full of hacks?]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I had actually tried this too, and it works just like the old stub file hack to move a DB out of the data folder. The problem with this approach is that you need access to the file system. As I see it, the customers who have FTI "disabled" are the larger ones (1,000's or 10,000's of users). They will never give you file system access and they should not have to. <br /><br />Why must my life be full of hacks?]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://blog.darrenduke.net/Darren/DDBZ.nsf/dx/the-most-useful-feature-of-lotus-notes-that-most-users-cant-use-full-text-indexing.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#07192010070039PMDDUUZJ.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>I think this is possible?</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 04:53:14 PM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Peter Smith</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>The most useful feature of Lotus Notes that most users can&#8217;t use - Full Text Indexing</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[As I just posted on vowe.net ({ <a href="http://vowe.net/archives/011584.html), " target="_blank" title="Link: vowe.net/archives/011584.html), ">http://vowe.net/archives/011584.html), I've just done a quick test, but found no problem with using a directory link file to access the FT index, e.g. database.ft pointing to a directory containing the index files somewhere outside the server data directory.</a> } I've just done a quick test, but found no problem with using a directory link file to access the FT index, e.g. database.ft pointing to a directory containing the index files somewhere outside the server data directory.<br /><br />This allowed me to update the index successfully either manually or via a server command, and search multiple databases. <br /><br />You can also create the dir link file, then build the index, and it gets built in the location specified. <br /><br />Still more testing required, but we'll try to offer this as an option in our FT Search Manager product, along with DWA mail & archive searching (another shameless plug, I'm outdoing myself)]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[As I just posted on vowe.net ({ <a href="http://vowe.net/archives/011584.html), " target="_blank" title="Link: vowe.net/archives/011584.html), ">http://vowe.net/archives/011584.html), I've just done a quick test, but found no problem with using a directory link file to access the FT index, e.g. database.ft pointing to a directory containing the index files somewhere outside the server data directory.</a> } I've just done a quick test, but found no problem with using a directory link file to access the FT index, e.g. database.ft pointing to a directory containing the index files somewhere outside the server data directory.<br /><br />This allowed me to update the index successfully either manually or via a server command, and search multiple databases. <br /><br />You can also create the dir link file, then build the index, and it gets built in the location specified. <br /><br />Still more testing required, but we'll try to offer this as an option in our FT Search Manager product, along with DWA mail & archive searching (another shameless plug, I'm outdoing myself)]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://blog.darrenduke.net/Darren/DDBZ.nsf/dx/the-most-useful-feature-of-lotus-notes-that-most-users-cant-use-full-text-indexing.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#19072010045314p.m.WEBSHB.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mr. Grumpy here....</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 12:26:41 PM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Craig Wiseman</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>&quot;I couldn&#8217;t find a Lotus BP in my area&quot; - or support a &quot;real&quot; Lotus BP</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[I hate to be all negative here, but to my (not-complete) knowledge, IBM's been working the partner listing AND renewal stealing issues for at least 5 years.<br /><br />I truly hope we see a different result this time.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I hate to be all negative here, but to my (not-complete) knowledge, IBM's been working the partner listing AND renewal stealing issues for at least 5 years.<br /><br />I truly hope we see a different result this time.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://blog.darrenduke.net/Darren/DDBZ.nsf/dx/i-couldnt-find-a-lotus-bp-in-my-area.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#07192010122641PMWEBMAQ.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Is Foundations different</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 11:27:50 AM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Sean Cull</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>An update on Anonymous access to Domino applications</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Darren,<br /><br />is Foundations different ? <br /><br />I contacted the IBM foundations lead in the UK after the comments Ray Davies made on your podcast about Foundations being special.<br /><br />IBM in the UK was unable to provide foundations specific licensing and suggested using the lotus notes licensing.<br /><br />Their quoted use case ( 10 staff and 100 customers accessing authenticated data from an nsf with just 10 licences ) fell apart as the conversation progressed.<br /><br />In the end I was told that it would require 110 licences<br /><br />Sean]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Darren,<br /><br />is Foundations different ? <br /><br />I contacted the IBM foundations lead in the UK after the comments Ray Davies made on your podcast about Foundations being special.<br /><br />IBM in the UK was unable to provide foundations specific licensing and suggested using the lotus notes licensing.<br /><br />Their quoted use case ( 10 staff and 100 customers accessing authenticated data from an nsf with just 10 licences ) fell apart as the conversation progressed.<br /><br />In the end I was told that it would require 110 licences<br /><br />Sean]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://blog.darrenduke.net/Darren/DDBZ.nsf/dx/an-update-on-anonymous-access-to-domino-applications.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#19072010112750WEBL5X.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Thinking back a few years</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 10:41:45 AM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Paul MOoney</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>The most useful feature of Lotus Notes that most users can&#8217;t use - Full Text Indexing</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[I asked for this at "ask the developers" at Lotusphere 2008. Lots of applause. No progress.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I asked for this at "ask the developers" at Lotusphere 2008. Lots of applause. No progress.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://blog.darrenduke.net/Darren/DDBZ.nsf/dx/the-most-useful-feature-of-lotus-notes-that-most-users-cant-use-full-text-indexing.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#07192010104145AMWEBK96.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>The real reason this will never get fixed...</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 08:54:13 AM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Nathan T. Freeman</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>The most useful feature of Lotus Notes that most users can&#8217;t use - Full Text Indexing</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Rather than making a few small adjustments in storage location and adding better automation to Domino's full-text search, IBM will instead pursue search as a separate add-on. In fact, they probably already HAVE, but typical of their marketing, we haven't heard of the product because it's IBM Websphere Enterprise Search Aggregator or some other such nonsense.<br /><br />At any rate, whatever it is, it probably has a 5-figure minimum purchase price, and requires 3 weeks of IBMGS consulting to set up. Once you set it up, there's probably a nightly batch process to run the indexes. And when you want to search your own email, you have to go to a web page, type in your search criteria, and submit it. Then the Aggregator server emails you a digest list with url links back to it's own presentation of your searched content (ie: not links to your own mail file in Notes)<br /><br />The justification for doing this is so you can search the ECM archives of your email at the same time, which of course are no longer stored in Domino.<br /><br />IBM may not ship this product yet, but I promise that there's some team working diligently on providing the worst possible user experience for searching your email, all in the name of "content management." And because it's a big ticket item, any attempts to improve native FT searching will be waved off as "non-strategic."]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Rather than making a few small adjustments in storage location and adding better automation to Domino's full-text search, IBM will instead pursue search as a separate add-on. In fact, they probably already HAVE, but typical of their marketing, we haven't heard of the product because it's IBM Websphere Enterprise Search Aggregator or some other such nonsense.<br /><br />At any rate, whatever it is, it probably has a 5-figure minimum purchase price, and requires 3 weeks of IBMGS consulting to set up. Once you set it up, there's probably a nightly batch process to run the indexes. And when you want to search your own email, you have to go to a web page, type in your search criteria, and submit it. Then the Aggregator server emails you a digest list with url links back to it's own presentation of your searched content (ie: not links to your own mail file in Notes)<br /><br />The justification for doing this is so you can search the ECM archives of your email at the same time, which of course are no longer stored in Domino.<br /><br />IBM may not ship this product yet, but I promise that there's some team working diligently on providing the worst possible user experience for searching your email, all in the name of "content management." And because it's a big ticket item, any attempts to improve native FT searching will be waved off as "non-strategic."]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://blog.darrenduke.net/Darren/DDBZ.nsf/dx/the-most-useful-feature-of-lotus-notes-that-most-users-cant-use-full-text-indexing.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#07192010085413AMWEBH5X.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Yeah...</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 07:34:42 AM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Erik Brooks</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>The most useful feature of Lotus Notes that most users can&#8217;t use - Full Text Indexing</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Yeah, I agree. I was just grasping at straws hoping there was some sort of rationale behind it all.<br /><br />Transaction logs in particular and SS archiving are great examples.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Yeah, I agree. I was just grasping at straws hoping there was some sort of rationale behind it all.<br /><br />Transaction logs in particular and SS archiving are great examples.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://blog.darrenduke.net/Darren/DDBZ.nsf/dx/the-most-useful-feature-of-lotus-notes-that-most-users-cant-use-full-text-indexing.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#07192010073442AMWEBFL9.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>what about encrypted drives?</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 06:51:42 AM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Darren Duke</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>SSDs too expensive? See if a hybrid drive can improve Lotus Notes start up times - &quot;Test 1 - a 4 year old laptop&quot;</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[No I have not tested WDE (whole drive encryption). WDE would be far better on SSD I would think. As all of my "test" drives are now in real computers I have no way to test right now. Sorry.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[No I have not tested WDE (whole drive encryption). WDE would be far better on SSD I would think. As all of my "test" drives are now in real computers I have no way to test right now. Sorry.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://blog.darrenduke.net/Darren/DDBZ.nsf/dx/ssds-too-expensive-see-if-a-hybrid-drive-can-improve-lotus-notes-start-up-times-test-1-a-4-year-old-laptop.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#07192010065142AMDDUERY.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>what about encrypted drives?</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 06:01:58 AM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Steve Dickson</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>SSDs too expensive? See if a hybrid drive can improve Lotus Notes start up times - &quot;Test 1 - a 4 year old laptop&quot;</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Have you run any tests on encrypted drives? In the financial industry, we have to encrypt all of our drives, which saps performance. I have a full SSD drive, and while it seems faster than my older drive, it is not a LOT faster. So... is the cache on these hybrid drives encrypted?]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Have you run any tests on encrypted drives? In the financial industry, we have to encrypt all of our drives, which saps performance. I have a full SSD drive, and while it seems faster than my older drive, it is not a LOT faster. So... is the cache on these hybrid drives encrypted?]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://blog.darrenduke.net/Darren/DDBZ.nsf/dx/ssds-too-expensive-see-if-a-hybrid-drive-can-improve-lotus-notes-start-up-times-test-1-a-4-year-old-laptop.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#07192010060158AMWEBDSA.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Because</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 02:47:45 AM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Pop Quiz - who knows the encryption strength and alogrithm that Lotus Notes port encryption uses?</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[I'm guessing that when Mike Rodin embraced the idea of the customers and business parners writing the documentation for him, the technical writers were downsized..<br /><br />---* Bill]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I'm guessing that when Mike Rodin embraced the idea of the customers and business parners writing the documentation for him, the technical writers were downsized..<br /><br />---* Bill]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://blog.darrenduke.net/Darren/DDBZ.nsf/dx/pop-quiz-who-knows-the-encryption-strength-and-alogrithm-than-lotus-notes-port-encryption-uses.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#19072010024745WEB9YW.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>I would think about buying that, if...</title>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 11:30:59 PM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Nathan T. Freeman</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>The most useful feature of Lotus Notes that most users can&#8217;t use - Full Text Indexing</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[...any of the features dating back to the R6 era were NOW enabled by default. If transaction logs were automatic (and refused to install on non-dedicated platters); if server-side archiving just asked you every day "what's your aging cutoff for old emails?"; if policies automatically set up for all the default settings and drew the admins attention for controls; if clusters were smart enough to auto-mirror NSFs; if Widget Catalogs were automatically generated and replicated against Greenhouse, devWorks or OpenNTF -- if ANY of those things happened, then yeah, I'd accept the "dot-oh" argument. But they don't.<br /><br />So no, I don't buy the battle-testing angle. It's just a rationalization.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[...any of the features dating back to the R6 era were NOW enabled by default. If transaction logs were automatic (and refused to install on non-dedicated platters); if server-side archiving just asked you every day "what's your aging cutoff for old emails?"; if policies automatically set up for all the default settings and drew the admins attention for controls; if clusters were smart enough to auto-mirror NSFs; if Widget Catalogs were automatically generated and replicated against Greenhouse, devWorks or OpenNTF -- if ANY of those things happened, then yeah, I'd accept the "dot-oh" argument. But they don't.<br /><br />So no, I don't buy the battle-testing angle. It's just a rationalization.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://blog.darrenduke.net/Darren/DDBZ.nsf/dx/the-most-useful-feature-of-lotus-notes-that-most-users-cant-use-full-text-indexing.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#07182010113059PMWEB65W.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Well....</title>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 07:05:39 PM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Erik Brooks</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>The most useful feature of Lotus Notes that most users can&#8217;t use - Full Text Indexing</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[@6 - Along those same lines: why do you have to add an INI parameter to allow creation of ODS51 databases?<br /><br />Now that I'm thinking about it, for new installs both features frankly SHOULD be on. For DAOS, simply default to use the Notes data directory -- the overhead is virtually the same as with DAOS off.<br /><br />For upgrades I'm actually OK with any "dot-oh" features requiring enablement. 8.5.0's DAOS implementation, while overall awesome, did have some fairly show-stopping corruption/missing-attachment issues. It wasn't until 8.5.1FP-something-or-other-CF-something-else that they had the last of those worked out.<br /><br />Maybe that's the real answer: Due to the "newness" of these features IBM decides to let us battle-test them. Maybe they'll turn them on by default in future versions? They've done this sort of thing for years with memory management INI settings (include as optional in one version, commit as default in the next).]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[@6 - Along those same lines: why do you have to add an INI parameter to allow creation of ODS51 databases?<br /><br />Now that I'm thinking about it, for new installs both features frankly SHOULD be on. For DAOS, simply default to use the Notes data directory -- the overhead is virtually the same as with DAOS off.<br /><br />For upgrades I'm actually OK with any "dot-oh" features requiring enablement. 8.5.0's DAOS implementation, while overall awesome, did have some fairly show-stopping corruption/missing-attachment issues. It wasn't until 8.5.1FP-something-or-other-CF-something-else that they had the last of those worked out.<br /><br />Maybe that's the real answer: Due to the "newness" of these features IBM decides to let us battle-test them. Maybe they'll turn them on by default in future versions? They've done this sort of thing for years with memory management INI settings (include as optional in one version, commit as default in the next).]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://blog.darrenduke.net/Darren/DDBZ.nsf/dx/the-most-useful-feature-of-lotus-notes-that-most-users-cant-use-full-text-indexing.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#07182010070539PMWEBV44.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Left out...</title>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 03:28:04 PM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Nathan T. Freeman</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>The most useful feature of Lotus Notes that most users can&#8217;t use - Full Text Indexing</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[...DAOS. You have to elect to implement DAOS. Think about that. It's just insane. If you have 8.5+ Domino server, it should just send you daily emails if you have Mail users and DAOS isn't enabled.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[...DAOS. You have to elect to implement DAOS. Think about that. It's just insane. If you have 8.5+ Domino server, it should just send you daily emails if you have Mail users and DAOS isn't enabled.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://blog.darrenduke.net/Darren/DDBZ.nsf/dx/the-most-useful-feature-of-lotus-notes-that-most-users-cant-use-full-text-indexing.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#07182010032804PMWEBQU4.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>A better question</title>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 01:04:38 PM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Nathan T. Freeman</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Pop Quiz - who knows the encryption strength and alogrithm that Lotus Notes port encryption uses?</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Why the hell isn't 128-bit encryption simply enabled by default? Under what circumstances would you NOT want it? The workload differential is trivial these days. Maybe in a Citrix environment it wouldn't be useful anyway, but it's also unlikely to hurt.<br /><br />Yet another great feature never revealed because Lotus leaves themselves victim to the implementer.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Why the hell isn't 128-bit encryption simply enabled by default? Under what circumstances would you NOT want it? The workload differential is trivial these days. Maybe in a Citrix environment it wouldn't be useful anyway, but it's also unlikely to hurt.<br /><br />Yet another great feature never revealed because Lotus leaves themselves victim to the implementer.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://blog.darrenduke.net/Darren/DDBZ.nsf/dx/pop-quiz-who-knows-the-encryption-strength-and-alogrithm-than-lotus-notes-port-encryption-uses.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#07182010010438PMWEBN2F.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>The most useful feature of Lotus Notes that most users can&#8217;t use - Full Text Indexing</title>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 12:45:07 PM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Darren Duke</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>The most useful feature of Lotus Notes that most users can&#8217;t use - Full Text Indexing</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[See <a href="http://blog.darrenduke.net/darren/ddbz.nsf/dx/pop-quiz-who-knows-the-encryption-strength-and-alogrithm-than-lotus-notes-port-encryption-uses.htm">this new post for port encryption testing</a>.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[See <a href="http://blog.darrenduke.net/darren/ddbz.nsf/dx/pop-quiz-who-knows-the-encryption-strength-and-alogrithm-than-lotus-notes-port-encryption-uses.htm">this new post for port encryption testing</a>.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://blog.darrenduke.net/Darren/DDBZ.nsf/dx/the-most-useful-feature-of-lotus-notes-that-most-users-cant-use-full-text-indexing.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#07182010124507PMDDUMNT.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Now this is useful</title>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 12:12:56 PM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Darren Duke</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>The most useful feature of Lotus Notes that most users can&#8217;t use - Full Text Indexing</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[It looks like since R6 we've had 128 bit.....time to test me thinks {<a href=" http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=0&q1=1097816&uid=swg21097816&loc=en_US&cs=utf-8&cc=us&lang=all" target="_blank">Link </a>}.<br /><br />It would be nice if this info was in the trace command too.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It looks like since R6 we've had 128 bit.....time to test me thinks {<a href=" http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=0&q1=1097816&uid=swg21097816&loc=en_US&cs=utf-8&cc=us&lang=all" target="_blank">Link </a>}.<br /><br />It would be nice if this info was in the trace command too.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://blog.darrenduke.net/Darren/DDBZ.nsf/dx/the-most-useful-feature-of-lotus-notes-that-most-users-cant-use-full-text-indexing.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#07182010121256PMDDUM2P.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>The most useful feature of Lotus Notes that most users can&#8217;t use - Full Text Indexing</title>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 12:00:16 PM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Darren Duke</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>The most useful feature of Lotus Notes that most users can&#8217;t use - Full Text Indexing</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[@1, I agree, why not store view indexes outside the NSF....I think this maybe a bit more difficult to achieve though than just place a xxx.ft folder in a different location ;)<br /><br />@2, as I was writing this post, I thought the exact same thing, that the new local replica controls coming in 8.5.2 would be "their" answer to this. I hope it is not because (a) local replica management has always been crap and 8.5.2 fixes that, and (b) this only fixes 1/3 of the issue. The other 2/3 being iNotes access and think client access. <br /><br />As Nathan brought this up in @2, I agree with Notes access outside the firewall, simply open 1352, turn on port encryption and have at it. However, can anyone point me to an undisputed source in the support side that stipulates exactly the type and strength that Notes uses. Last I looked it was "believed" to be 64 bit RC4 { <a href="http://searchdomino.techtarget.com/expert/KnowledgebaseAnswer/0,289625,sid4_gci797613,00.html" target="_blank">Link</a>}.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[@1, I agree, why not store view indexes outside the NSF....I think this maybe a bit more difficult to achieve though than just place a xxx.ft folder in a different location ;)<br /><br />@2, as I was writing this post, I thought the exact same thing, that the new local replica controls coming in 8.5.2 would be "their" answer to this. I hope it is not because (a) local replica management has always been crap and 8.5.2 fixes that, and (b) this only fixes 1/3 of the issue. The other 2/3 being iNotes access and think client access. <br /><br />As Nathan brought this up in @2, I agree with Notes access outside the firewall, simply open 1352, turn on port encryption and have at it. However, can anyone point me to an undisputed source in the support side that stipulates exactly the type and strength that Notes uses. Last I looked it was "believed" to be 64 bit RC4 { <a href="http://searchdomino.techtarget.com/expert/KnowledgebaseAnswer/0,289625,sid4_gci797613,00.html" target="_blank">Link</a>}.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://blog.darrenduke.net/Darren/DDBZ.nsf/dx/the-most-useful-feature-of-lotus-notes-that-most-users-cant-use-full-text-indexing.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#07182010120016PMDDULSS.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Skeptical</title>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 11:48:11 AM -0400</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Nathan T. Freeman</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>The most useful feature of Lotus Notes that most users can&#8217;t use - Full Text Indexing</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[With the new managed cache mode in 8.5.2, I'm skeptical as to whether IBM will be motivated to make this change. Perhaps if we can find a reason why it's needed for the sake of LotusLive...<br /><br />Just like the Widget Catalog, DCT, ID Vaults, Policies, SmartUpdate, Presence Awareness, Server-side Archiving and Clustering, IBM remains content to let the user experience be dictated by the implementer instead of the vendor. As a result, Notes shops not large enough to employ full-time professional admins and not progressive enough to find a high-quality services from a business partner are under constant siege. You're absolutely correct, Darren, that people will believe this statement about search from Google simply because it's been their own experience. In the same vein, they're likely to believe the lies about not being able to access Notes mail over the internet, because they have admins who don't understand NRPC encryption or the iNotes redirector.<br /><br />As far as I can tell, IBM operates on the constant assumption that all their customers have business partner relationships to address implementation issues. One VP recently learned that this is not at all true, even in organizations where you'd expect it (like mid-sized pharmaceuticals.) Until the reality sets in that on-premises admins in organizations of less than 1000 are not motivated to make Notes a world-class experience themselves, we're not going to see these kinds of simple, basic changes that would make the vast majority of customers much happier. It's just not part of their reality.<br /><br />I believe some robots pointed out that the consequence of leaving things in the hands of IT administrators is the continued attrition of the platform in mid-market shops.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[With the new managed cache mode in 8.5.2, I'm skeptical as to whether IBM will be motivated to make this change. Perhaps if we can find a reason why it's needed for the sake of LotusLive...<br /><br />Just like the Widget Catalog, DCT, ID Vaults, Policies, SmartUpdate, Presence Awareness, Server-side Archiving and Clustering, IBM remains content to let the user experience be dictated by the implementer instead of the vendor. As a result, Notes shops not large enough to employ full-time professional admins and not progressive enough to find a high-quality services from a business partner are under constant siege. You're absolutely correct, Darren, that people will believe this statement about search from Google simply because it's been their own experience. In the same vein, they're likely to believe the lies about not being able to access Notes mail over the internet, because they have admins who don't understand NRPC encryption or the iNotes redirector.<br /><br />As far as I can tell, IBM operates on the constant assumption that all their customers have business partner relationships to address implementation issues. One VP recently learned that this is not at all true, even in organizations where you'd expect it (like mid-sized pharmaceuticals.) Until the reality sets in that on-premises admins in organizations of less than 1000 are not motivated to make Notes a world-class experience themselves, we're not going to see these kinds of simple, basic changes that would make the vast majority of customers much happier. It's just not part of their reality.<br /><br />I believe some robots pointed out that the consequence of leaving things in the hands of IT administrators is the continued attrition of the platform in mid-market shops.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://blog.darrenduke.net/Darren/DDBZ.nsf/dx/the-most-useful-feature-of-lotus-notes-that-most-users-cant-use-full-text-indexing.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#07182010114811AMWEBLJN.htm</link>
</item>

</channel></rss>
