June 27 2010 Sunday
Hybrid drive and Lotus Notes start up times - "Test 2 - a 1 year old desktop"
As I outlined in the original hybrid drive post earlier today, the performance of a laptop with the Seagate Momentus XT Hybrid Drive is nothing short of phenomenal. In this post we see if the same can be said for desktop computers using the XT drive.
The main physical difference between a laptop drive and a desktop drive is size. The former being a 2.5" drive, the latter a 3.5". Also the height on desktop drive is much, much larger (maybe 1" or so) while laptop drives a much thinner (maybe 3/8" or so). The XT is a SATA drive so the same SATA connectors were used on both the original 3.5" drive and the 2.5" XT drive.
Incidentally, laptop drives usually use less power than their desktop counterparts and the XT specs mention an average 1.1W operating power and 0.8W at idle.
As with the other test, I imaged the original drive (OS, applications, and all) using Acronis Wcho Workstation 9 and placed this identical image onto the XT drive. This was done to more correctly measure real-world computer performance and not some lab test.
The computer in this post is Lisa's main STS desktop machine and has Skype, Tweetdeck and other applications a "power" business user would have. So what's the verdict.........
Test 2 - Dell Optiplex 330 Desktop
Approx 12 months old and is Lisa's main office computer.
Specs:
Intel Core Duo 2 E7200 @ 2.53Ghz
2GB RAM
Windows XP Pro SP3
Notes 8.5.2 CD5
Original drive was a 160GB 7200 RPM 8MB hard drive with SATA 300. (ST3160815AS).
All times in seconds
Again, so pretty impressive results. This goes to show that putting a 2.5" XT hybrid drive in a desktop can lead to some considerable improvements over classic, pure mechanical drives.
Now, for the sake of clarity, I bought my test drives in the retail channel (from TigerDirect), but as of today, in the US, you can order quantities of 25 or more from STS should you wish. Be mindful these things are selling like hotcakes so be patient if you are wanting some.
P.S. I don't think Lisa will let me get this drive back ;)
The main physical difference between a laptop drive and a desktop drive is size. The former being a 2.5" drive, the latter a 3.5". Also the height on desktop drive is much, much larger (maybe 1" or so) while laptop drives a much thinner (maybe 3/8" or so). The XT is a SATA drive so the same SATA connectors were used on both the original 3.5" drive and the 2.5" XT drive.
Incidentally, laptop drives usually use less power than their desktop counterparts and the XT specs mention an average 1.1W operating power and 0.8W at idle.
As with the other test, I imaged the original drive (OS, applications, and all) using Acronis Wcho Workstation 9 and placed this identical image onto the XT drive. This was done to more correctly measure real-world computer performance and not some lab test.
The computer in this post is Lisa's main STS desktop machine and has Skype, Tweetdeck and other applications a "power" business user would have. So what's the verdict.........
Test 2 - Dell Optiplex 330 Desktop
Approx 12 months old and is Lisa's main office computer.
Specs:
Intel Core Duo 2 E7200 @ 2.53Ghz
2GB RAM
Windows XP Pro SP3
Notes 8.5.2 CD5
Original drive was a 160GB 7200 RPM 8MB hard drive with SATA 300. (ST3160815AS).
All times in seconds
Old Drive | New Drive pass 1 | New Drive pass 2 | Difference old vs pass 2 | |
From BIOS to Windows being loaded and drive activity ceasing | 146 | 92 | 39 | 73% reduction in load time |
Lotus Notes 8.5.2 CD5 loaded to home screen | 34 | 27 | 8 | 76% reduction in load time |
Again, so pretty impressive results. This goes to show that putting a 2.5" XT hybrid drive in a desktop can lead to some considerable improvements over classic, pure mechanical drives.
Now, for the sake of clarity, I bought my test drives in the retail channel (from TigerDirect), but as of today, in the US, you can order quantities of 25 or more from STS should you wish. Be mindful these things are selling like hotcakes so be patient if you are wanting some.
P.S. I don't think Lisa will let me get this drive back ;)
Darren Duke
|
June 27 2010 11:24:00 AM
|
lotus notes performance ssd storage
|
While Pass1 was impressive for the laptop, I wonder why 8.5.2cd5 seems so slow on the desktop.